12,375 thoughts on “Vision Quest

  1. ??????????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ??????????? ??? ???????? ??-?? ??????? ??????????? ????????????, ? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????????, ???????? ?? ???????? ?????. ????? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????, ???????? ? ?????????????, ????????? ???????? ???????, ????????? ????????, ????? ????????-?????????? ???????, ?????????? ??????????? ???????????, ?????????, ??????, ?????????? ? ????????????? ?????????. ??? ?????? ??????? ?????????? ????, ??? ?????? ???????? ????????????? ? ?????, ??? ??????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????????? ????????? ? ??? ???? ??????????? ????????, ????????, ???????, ???????, ?????????? ????????? ? ?????? ??????? ???????????.
    ???????????? ? ???????? – ???????? ?? ??? ????? ?? ?????

  2. OK — have been messing about with this thing for something like four months now and it’s basically bookmarked at this point, so figured I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. Am based in the UK, generally stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.

    How I found it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an each way return actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. I’d just wing it and get a shock. Now I stick my stake in before I place anything, even the boring singles.

    The single bet calculator tool is the part I open most — type in the price and your stake and you get returns with no faffing, fractions or decimals. It also handles the multiples — trebles maths, lucky 15 and lucky 63, patents and yankees, honestly that’s where I’d always lose track. Have a go yourself, it’s over at accumulator bet calculator — free, no signup.

    What actually changed how I bet was the nerdier extras. They’ve got an odds-to-probability calculator that shows what margin’s baked in, and there’s the kelly tool — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is terrifying. The dutch tool gets used a fair bit when I’m spreading across selections.

    It’s not perfect mind. The interface feels pretty plain — zero frills, it’s clearly function over form. On mobile it’s fine although the lucky 63 breakdown need a bit of scrolling. And no proper app, it’s a website and that’s it — slight shame but you asked.

    Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does what it says. If anyone honestly does the maths on paper, give it a go — it’s saved me a load of arguments with the bookie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *